Sunday, 12 March 2023

Characterization- 'A Tale Of Two Cities'


 
 
 


Characterization in A Tale Of Two Cities
Reference Material


A Tale of Two Cities, a novel by Charles Dickens, was published both serially and in book form in 1859. The story is set in the late 18th century against the background of the French Revolution. The complex plot involves Sydney Carton’s sacrifice of his own life on behalf of his friends Charles Darnay and Lucie Manette.
 

 The book is perhaps best known for its opening lines, “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,” and for Carton’s last speech, in which he says of his replacing Darnay in a prison cell, “It is a far, far better thing that I do than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known.”

Characters are crucial to all books, novels, articles, and other pieces of literature. Their characteristics, actions, personalities, and looks allow an author to create any story he or she can dream of with the use of unique characters.

Dickens is one of the greatest creators of characters in English fiction. A mere glance of at the list of persons who figure in any of his novels is enough to remind us of the author’s amazing fertility in the invention. He has portrayed a whole variety of characters such as David Copperfield, Pip, Trotwood, and Sam Weller. There is no shortage of real and unique characters in his works.

A Tale Of Two Cities affords ample evidence of Dickens’ capacity for the character –portrayal. The range of characters in A Tale Of Two Cities is wide and has deep and penetrating studies. Some of the figures like Monsieur Defarge and Madame Defarge are memorable. Dicken's purpose in the case of this novel was to allow the characters to reveal themselves through incidents and through their deeds and actions rather than through dialogues.

Charles Dickens creates a powerful story with the use of his characters in A Tale of Two Cities. Some of his characters are more important than others, but none of them go unnoticed and none of them are unnecessary. Dickens refrains from using complex characters, therefore making them easy to understand and relate to. The development of each of his characters is clear and evident. The theme is also important to a story; without theme, there would be no moral to a story. Alongside the development of the characters, Charles Dickens creates a very powerful theme in this novel. The theme in A Tale of Two Cities is the need for sacrifice. Dickens uses three specific characters to present this theme. A different story is told through each character and Dickens uses them in three unique ways. Charles Dickens develops the characters of Doctor Manette, Charles Darnay, and Sydney Carton to display the theme of the need for sacrifice.

 A Tale of Two Cities is, in many ways, Doctor Manette's story. The Doctor's release from the Bastille begins the novel, and the mystery of his imprisonment creates tension throughout the book. The reading of his letter ultimately condemns Darnay to death, forcing Carton to sacrifice his life. A close reading of the book reveals the Doctor to be one of its few complex characters. Throughout the course of the novel, he is seen as an aspiring young doctor, a prisoner who craves revenge and who descends into madness, and a man who fights to regain his mind, his family, and his profession. His life after prison is a continual struggle against the shadows of madness and despair that are his legacy from the Bastille.

The love he has for his daughter helps him to overcome the darkness in his life, even giving him the strength to welcome the son of his enemy as a son-in-law. When his status as a Bastille prisoner becomes an asset at the end of the book, he regains the strength and confidence that characterized him before his imprisonment. When his bitter, angry letter surfaces, however, the past undermines his stability.

Through the Doctor, Dickens makes a statement regarding the nature of forgiveness and revenge. The Doctor's ability to forgive brings him happiness in his daughter's marriage and children. However, his past demand for revenge has the power to destroy his life and the lives of his family. Additionally, whereas revenge leads the Doctor to a state of dementia, forgiveness raises him to a level of intellectual vigor and emotional happiness. In showing these contrasting aspects of Doctor Manette's character, Dickens emphasizes the concepts of the destructive power of revenge and the healing power of forgiveness.

The second important character in the story is Lucie. Dickens describes Lucie as being beautiful physically and spiritually, and she possesses a gift for bringing out the best qualities of those around her. She is one of the lesser-developed characters in the novel, but she is "the golden thread" that binds many of the characters' lives together.
 
A reader can best judge Lucie by her actions and influences on other characters rather than by her dialogue, which tends to be melodramatic and full of stock sentimentality. Dickens portrays her as a compassionate, virtuous woman who inspires great love and loyalty in the other characters. For example, Darnay, Carton, and Stryver all court her and envision their futures being made brighter with her as their wife. Additionally, both Mr. Lorry and Miss Pross, who are without families, love Lucie as if she were their daughter and do everything they can to keep her safe. Although Lucie is a flat character, she is an important one. She represents unconditional love and compassion, and Dickens uses her to demonstrate how powerful these qualities can be, even in the face of violence and hatred.

Another important and major character in the novel is Charles Darney. Although Darnay rejects the Evrémonde name and inheritance and moves to England, he cannot escape his family history. Trying to make compensation to an unknown woman whose family was wiped out by his father and uncle, he is arrested for treason in England; trying to save a jailed family servant, he is arrested in revolutionary France, where he is tried twice. His sense of responsibility motivates him to right wrongs, but he is otherwise a passive character who lets events direct his fate rather than trying to control it himself. Forces outside of his control inevitably foil even his attempts to assert himself and atone for his family's transgressions, placing him in increasingly dangerous situations from which he must be rescued.

Darnay represents justice and duty, qualities inherited from his mother. He (and his mother) also stands for the members of the French aristocracy who were aware of the damage their families were inflicting, but who could do nothing to prevent it. Darnay's willingness to atone for his family's wrongs and to work for a living demonstrate that eventually, something good can come out of evil, a point that Dickens emphasizes at the end of the novel.

Carton, Darnay's double and alter-ego has wasted his life on alcohol and apathy. He makes his intelligence obvious through his ability to analyze cases for Stryver. He makes clear that he had the same opportunities for success as Stryver, but for some reason chose not to take them. Besides some vague references to his student days and the disclosure that his parents died when he was young, Carton's past remains a mystery to the reader. Consequently, the reader can only guess what caused him to become so degenerated. The only noble part of his life is his love for Lucie and his affection for the rest of her family. His love for her is strong enough to induce him to give his life for that of her husband.

Carton takes on a mythical aspect in sacrificing himself to save his friends. He represents the sacrificial hero who is ritually slaughtered of his own free will so that society might renew itself, a prospect he envisions before he dies. Through his death, he redeems his sins and is reborn in the afterlife and through the life of his namesake. Sydney Carton is one of the most dynamic and poignant characters in the novels. Readers, critics, and Dickens fans offer a multitude of words on the subject of Sydney Carton. Some view him as the most heroic of heroes. Others see him as a miserable drunkard, welcoming the guillotine as a way to escape from an unhappy existence. He is a complex character, evolving as the novel progresses. Upon studying Dickens’ novel, Carton’s heroism becomes indisputably clear. Dickens’ establishment of Carton as a flawed man merely elevates Carton as a hero, demonstrating how an ordinary, struggling human being can become extraordinary. Dickens gradually details Carton’s character growth as Carton’s love for Lucie Manette spurs him to acts of greatness.

Childless and merciless, Madame Defarge is the antithesis of Lucie Manette. Both women possess the ability to inspire others, but while Lucie creates and nurtures life, Madame Defarge destroys it. Because her entire family perished when she was a young girl, Madame Defarge wants revenge, not merely on the family that caused the evil but on the entire class from which it came. What makes her such a threatening figure is her stubborn patience, which bides its time until it can strike. In this, she is like some natural force that, when the opportunity is right, becomes ferocious and unrelenting. Her secret management of Darnay's re-arrest is cunning but shows immense cruelty as well. In seeking to avenge her family, she has acquired the same ruthlessness as the men who destroyed her family. Her knitting represents both her patience and her urge to get revenge because she knits the names of her intended victims. Symbolically, Madame Defarge stands for the intensity and bloodthirst behind the Revolution. Her relentless drive for vengeance makes her strong, but it eventually destroys her because she is unable to comprehend the powerful love that gives Carton the strength to die for Darnay, and Miss Pross the courage to defeat her.

Her husband Defarge was Doctor Alexandre Manette's servant. When the Doctor was newly released from prison, Defarge was not above exploiting his insanity as a spectacle to further the revolutionary cause. As a revolutionary leader, Defarge organizes the Jacquerie and helps lead the mob in storming the Bastille. He bases his desire for a revolution more upon a desire for positive change than the blood thirst of his wife, as demonstrated when he resists denouncing Doctor Manette, Lucie, and young Lucie simply because of their relationship to Darnay. His wife interprets his scruples as weakness, giving the reader the impression that before long revolutionaries such as Jacques Three will turn on Defarge and send him to the guillotine himself. Defarge represents the more rational aspect of the Revolution. He is not blinded by class hatred and retains his conscience and sense of fairness. His ability to empathize with those people Madame Defarge views as enemies, however, will probably result in his death, showing how out of control the Revolution became as paranoia and violence destroyed its positive forces.

Well, in nearly all novels by Dickens, characters take the main stage and generally are just as important as the plot because of their complexity. As such, A Tale of Two Cities offers far more to the reader than the title suggests, particularly because of the enormous complexity of the characters—both major and minor.

“A Tale of Two Cities” by Dickens is also a series of tales about dual identities and the ways in which one character serves as a foil to another. In Books I and II of “Tale of Two Cities”, Dickens establishes the setting and the dynamic relationships among the characters, all of whom are struggling, to greater and lesser degrees, with their positions regarding the Revolution and as a result, this creates a struggle with their identities. While some characters in the Dickens novel “A Tale of Two Cities”, especially Darnay, clearly have more acute conflicts to resolve and far more to lose than the seemingly minor characters, it is by examining the marginal characters that the reader can understand the dynamic conflicts of the period more fully. Two of the novel’s marginal characters, John Barsad, the duplicitous spy, and Gaspard, the quiet but determined peasant who takes justice into his own hands, represent two faces of the Revolution and help to emphasize the conflicts and conditions of the major characters.
When John Barsad is introduced in the novel, it is immediately clear that he is not only self-serving and hypocritical, he is a man who is not to be trusted. While he is not a popular character, he is, nonetheless an excellent candidate for a character analysis as Barsad is complex and multilayered. He testifies falsely against Darnay for spying, when he himself is a spy which shows him to be not only untrustworthy but willing to be a hypocrite when his own interests are at stake. Barsad will eventually play a significant role in other aspects of Darnay’s affairs as well. Although Barsad represents himself before the court as a loyal patriot, a skilled barrister exposes Barsad’s seedier side as a gambler and debtor. The narrator of “A Tale of Two Cities” by Dickens describes Barsad as “a hired spy and traitor, an unblushing trafficker in blood, and one of the greatest scoundrels upon the earth since accursed Judas–which he certainly did look rather like…" (Dickens 72).

This description is apt, and it foreshadows the effects that Barsad will have on the other characters. While he is a minor character in the larger scheme of the novel, his sphere of influence is rather extensive, and his actions have a decisive impact on the trajectory of the plot and upon the decisions of the other characters. When he visits the Defarge’s wine shop, for instance, Barsad knowingly drops a tidbit of information that he knows will set a chain of events into motion. He reveals that Lucie is to be married to Darnay. This is news that puts the DeFarges into conflict because they care for Lucie and her father, but not for Darnay. This information shapes Madame DaFarge’s future revolutionary activities.

While Gaspard is a different sort of character altogether. Whereas Barsad is obnoxious and grandstanding, trying to seem like someone more respectable than he is, Gaspard is quiet and unassuming. Nonetheless, Gaspard holds as least as much power and influence as Barsad exercises, for he takes justice into his own hands and kills the Marquis for having run over his child and then insulting him with the compensation of a coin. While the reader of A Tale of Two Cities is never privy to the thought process that leads to Gaspard’s decision to ride on the undercarriage and stab the Marquis in his sleep, it is perhaps easy enough for the reader to empathize with this marginal character, for he could be any common man who has been wronged by a haughty and careless aristocrat. Gaspard’s actions are a mirror of revolutionary thought and feeling, and it is through Gaspard that we can understand the sentiments that provoked uprisings against the traditional social structure. Gaspard not only represents but embodies fully, the suffering and rage of his class. Rather than accepting his position of powerlessness, however, he finds a way to seize personal agency and act upon it. In doing so, he clearly affects the life—or rather, the death—of the Marquis, but his action also influences Darnay’s position and the circumstances which will eventually envelop him later in the novel. Beyond affecting Darnay, though, Gaspard’s actions serve as the spark for the Revolution itself. It is the tipping point for some characters; those who might have felt lukewarm about the Revolution beforehand, are incensed by Gaspard’s sentence and execution and are thereby compelled to change their opinions.

Aside from these cases, the literary canon of the novel is full of examples of seemingly minor men and women who become heroes and highly worthy of character analysis, hardly-noticed characters who turn into villains, and people of no reputation who shape the entire course of a novel’s events. This is part of what makes the story Dickens is telling so interesting—even though the events themselves are worthy of note, the characters who are the subjects of great interest and character analysis and their level of complexity make A Tale of Two Cities what it is.

Beyond offering the reader a mere narration of the events leading up to the Revolution, Dickens creates suspense, tension, and the opportunity for opinions and actions to be transformed by uplifting the influence of characters worthy of intense character analysis in “A Tale of Two Cities” by Dickens who would otherwise be marginal to the plot. John Barsad and Gaspard are two men who are quite different from one another, and who also differ in their motives and means of expressing their power and influence. Nonetheless, in several relatively brief scenes, both men shape the outcome of the novel by acting upon their beliefs and passions decisively and without apology. As a result, the lives of the major characters in “A Tale of Two Cities” by Dickens and the decisions that they are able and choose to make are transformed.

Interpretation - Murder in the Cathedral

                                              Interpretation -  Murder in the Cathedral



Murder in the Cathedral was written by Eliot for a special occasion the Canterbury festival in June 1935. Basically, the plot is concerned with the death, and martyrdom of Thomas Becket. It can easily be called the first successful modern religious play.

Though essentially religious and theological in the subject, the play is perfectly adapted to a form nearest to that of the Aeschylean tragedy. The play proves that a religious theme need not deter it from becoming a great drama.

Basically, the play deals not so much with the murder of the Archbishop as with the significance of martyrdom. The play is about the spiritual state of a martyr facing death; the spiritual education of the poor women of Canterbury who are witnesses to this sacrifice, and the willful opposition of secular to religious power. The central theme of the play Murder in the Cathedral, therefore, is martyrdom: martyrdom for the right reason and its capacity to fructify the life of the common man. As D.E. Jones remarks, the play is "not just a dramatization of the death of Thomas Becket. It is a deep-searching study of the significance of martyrdom. There is no attempt at naturalism or the creation of illusion. The historical detail is severely subordinated to the pattern or design of martyrdom which gives the play its shape as well as its meaning." 

Temptation Theme

      Closely related to the central theme of martyrdom is that of temptation and it has obvious religious significance. Significantly enough the temptation which is most difficult to resist is that which emanates within, from the root of the subconscious. The first three temptations that assail Thomas are easily overcome for he is more or less beyond what they offer. The fourth tempter reveals a temptation to which Thomas is in danger of succumbing. As soon as Thomas becomes aware of it, it ceases to be a temptation and becomes "the instrument of purgatorial suffering". Out of this suffering comes the desperate questions and appeal of Thomas, leading to the cry: "Can I neither act nor suffer without perdition?" The fourth tempter replies "action is suffering and suffering action (paradox). After which the Chorus, the priests, and the tempters, in alternation, present a vision of horror: The Chorus finally chants: "Destroy yourself and we are destroyed" Thomas now knows the true meaning of martyrdom. The last temptation was the greatest reason - "to do the right deed for the wrong reason." But he is now free of it. Thus Thomas is ready to face martyrdom for the right reason, having overcome the temptation that could have led him to damnation.
 
The Character of Thomas

      Thomas's character undergoes a perceptible evolution in the course of the play. Eliot succeeds in impressing the reader that this change is both natural and inevitable. As Francis Fergusson says, Becket can be seen as an archetypal figure, the religious martyr, wrestling with an archetypal problem, the subtle temptations of the religious conscience. The truth of character is gained not by a full portrayal of Thomas in all his rich personality, but, as David Clerk remarks, by the precision and sensitivity which delineates the mental struggles of any great and religious man in this archetypal situation.
 

Classical in Treatment

The material has been carefully selected, pruned, and ordered so that there is full concentration on the central theme. As has been mentioned before, historical and political elements have been relegated to the background and the personal conflict between King Henry II and Thomas has not been dealt with directly. The emphasis is on martyrdom, and to this end, Eliot opens his play at a comparatively late stage in the life of Becket, at a stage when he is very near his martyrdom. Necessary information about earlier events is provided through the comments of the Chorus and the priests. Everything superfluous is done away with and the result is classical "simplicity, symmetry and regularity of outline." The concentration on the central theme achieves the brevity and effectiveness of a classical tragedy.
 
The Chorus

 An important and obvious Greek element in the play is Eliot's use of Chorus. Made up of the ordinary poor women of Canterbury, the Chorus provides information, comments on the characters, and the action from the viewpoint of common humanity, and also creates an atmosphere. Eliot has restored the Chorus of Greek tragedy after centuries, "to mediate between the action and the audience; to intensify the action by projecting its emotional consequences. As a result, the audience sees them doubly, by seeing its effect on other people".

The Chorus expresses, in the music and imagery of the verse, the suffering which results from Thomas's peril, suffering similar to his, yet on a different level of awareness. The Chorus also reveals to Thomas the "right reason" for his martyrdom though here again, it does so without truly comprehending anything itself. Their appeal: "Save yourself that we may be saved/Destroy yourself and we are destroyed". Apparently helps Thomas to see the Will of God (as against his own ambitious or suicidal will) in his move towards martyrdom. Eliot has given the Chorus a new significance in the light of Christian dispensation. It represents the great mass of individuals Christ came to save "We acknowledge ourselves as a type of the common men". Some of the greatest plays have given to the Chorus most beautiful poetry. As Helen Gardner remarks, the fluctuations of the Chorus are the real measure of Thomas's spiritual conquests.
 
Ritual Element

The play can be approached through a comparison with ritual elements as found in ancient drama. Fergusson considers the basic plot structure to derive from the ritual form of ancient tragedy. The ritual motif endows the play with a kind of secondary pattern - the pattern of myth which reinforces the theological pattern.
 
Agon and Epiphany

 The first part can be said to correspond to the agon, the contest, or the struggle. The main characters are the Chorus of women, three priests, four tempters, and Thomas. The issue is whether Thomas will suffer martyrdom and, if so, how. It is clearly set forth in the scene between Thomas and the tempters, while the priests worry about the physical security of the Church, and the women have dreadful premonitions of violation - "a more metaphysical horror."

Overcoming the first three tempters, and faced with the fourth, Thomas nearly despairs. Ultimately, however, Becket sees his way, clearly. This concludes Part I. The Interlude can be compared to another element of ancient drama, the epiphany. In this case, it sets forth the idea of martyrdom. It corresponds to the epiphany following the Agon, from the point of view of dramatic form. The subject of the Interlude is also another demonstration of the basic idea in the play.
 
Spectacle

The element of spectacle dominates Part II of the play. This is connected with an earlier scene. Part II is, from the point of view of Thomas's drama, merely the apparent result of his agon (contest or struggle) with the tempters. He now suffers what he had foreseen at the end of Part I.

There are various spectacular effects in this part. There is the procession of the Priests with their banners commemorating three Saints' days. The four knights (corresponding as a group to the tempters of Part I) arrive and demand Thomas's surrender to the King and then they kill him while the Chorus laments and the Dies Irae is sung off stage. After the murder, the knights rationalize the deed in a style that denotes common sense and logic.

Part I is addressed to the. understanding; Part II is rhythmic, visual, exciting, and musical and thus contrasts with Part I. Part externalizes an internal conflict and in Part II the conflict itself is external.
 
Universality through the Use of Myth

The essentially religious theme has been given a universal appeal and interest through the Greek and Christian myth that is provided us an under pattern. The seasonal myth and its parallel with the Christian story of Easter is used (the passion of a god, his death and rebirth, by which the yearly cycle of the disappearance of the seed into the ground and its re-emergence as new life in the spring is assured).

Eliot sees a parallel to the martyrdom of Becket in the death of Oedipus and to some extent, the death of Christ. Sophocles Oedipus has a similar attitude towards suffering as Eliot's Becket, Both overcome temptations. Both die gloriously and each one's death brings benefit to the people, though on different planes.

An analogy for Becket's martyrdom can also be found in the death and crucifixion of Christ bringing redemption to mankind. The texture of the play is enriched by this parallelism and Eliot has been able to show that martyrdom is a universal phenomenon, as essential in the ancient past as in the Middle Ages and, by implication, also in modern times. The knights' apologia is addressed in 20th-century idiom and language, directly to the modern audience. Even though the play has a religious and historical subject, their speech serves to impart a secular interest to the play and brings out the contemporary relevance of martyrdom.
 
Action and Suffering

 The play is coherent, illustrating the antithesis of action and suffering, or ignorance and awareness; an antithesis which sometimes becomes an ironical equation, "between action, suffering and knowledge-ignorance". All the parts are instances of the action suffering, knowing-unknowing formula and it is the germinal idea of the play.
 
More than Reason Can Grasp

 Reason by itself is shown to be inadequate in grasping spiritual truth. Reason cannot grasp the truth of the human situation which rests upon "revealed truth" which can only be seen in the paradoxical formulas of theology "at, once reasoned and beyond reason." Mere intellect and logic would reduce martyrdom to "suicide while of unsound mind". Its significance can only be perceived by something beyond mere reason.
 
Verification

 The strength of the play, as many critics have pointed out, lies n its versification, language, diction, and imagery. The verse has a certain flexibility and variety. Eliot has developed a style suitable for each kind of scene. The quarrels between Thomas and the Knights, being on a superficial level, are in rhymed doggerel. A more subtle four-stress verse is used for the tempters who bring out the complicated developments of Becket's inner struggle. The Chorus, to whom the greatest poetry in the play is given, speaks in a variety of forms, suited to a particular mood and situation, from the simple three stress lines to very complex pieces for their appeals and praise.

 Rhetorical devices like alliteration, balance, and antithesis impart intensity to the verse which makes it very effective. Sean Lucy says "It is the power of the dramatic verse that gives the play its unique quality of unity and intensity. The language is the verse, which is the atmosphere, which is the meaning".
 
Demerits

  No literary work can be completely free of certain demerits. The fault found in this play is the shadowy nature of most of its characters-they are symbolic and not of flesh and blood. Helen Gardner remarks that Thomas Becket is hardly tempted and that there is no time for marked inner development as the play opens very near the climax. Furthermore, there is very little action. These drawbacks can, however, be overruled in the face of the general greatness of the play.
 
Conclusion

 Murder in the Cathedral shows a path to poetic drama. The play, in spite of its perfections, should be considered not "as the drama to end all dramas but as one example of the art in our confused times". It should be regarded as "employing only one of many possible strategies for making modern poetic drama".




Murder in the Cathedral – Background of the Play

 


Murder in the Cathedral – Background of the Play

                                          (by  T.S Eliot - first performed in 1935)

‘The theatre as well as the church is enriched by this poetic play of grave beauty and momentous decision’ — New York Times

 

 One of the most notorious episodes in medieval English history took place at Canterbury Cathedral on 29 December 1170. During evening vespers, Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury and previous friend of King Henry II, was murdered by four of the king’s knights, William de Tracy, Reginald Fitzurse, Hugh de Morville and Richard Brito. They are said to have been provoked to action by Henry’s annoyed words, ‘What miserable drones and traitors have I nurtured and promoted in my household who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born clerk!’ 

 Becket's martyrdom was the subject of T. S. Eliot’s verse drama Murder in the Cathedral, first performed on 15 June 1935 in the Chapter House of Canterbury Cathedral before it moved to a run at the Mercury Theatre in London. Eliot’s play drew on the work of an eyewitness to the event, a clerk named Edward Grim who had attempted to defend Becket from William de Tracy’s blow. Henry had actually hoped that the appointment of his chancellor, Thomas Becket, as Archbishop of Canterbury, would help him to reassert royal authority over the Church. But the king had not anticipated that Becket would resign as chancellor shortly after he was elevated to the seat of Canterbury.

As such, the conflict between Henry II and Becket centered on the persistent issue of the balance between royal and popular authority and the rights of the church in England.Becket’s murder sent shockwaves across Western Christendom. The four knights were excommunicated by Pope Alexander III, who ordered them to serve in the Holy land for 14 years while they sought his forgiveness. Becket himself was canonized in February 1173, less than 3 years after his death, and Canterbury Cathedral became a major site of pilgrimage – Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, from the late 14th century, are testament to the continued popularity of pilgrimage to the shrine of St Thomas.

 Henry II, meanwhile, undertook a public act of penance on 12 July 1174. Confessing to indirect responsibility for the murder, he entered Canterbury in sackcloth, both barefoot and mute, and made a pilgrimage to the crypt of St Thomas where he was whipped by the monks while he lay prostrate and naked by the tomb.

When the Bishop of Chichester commissioned the poet and dramatist T.S. Eliot to write a play for the Canterbury Festival of 1935, Eliot decided to link his subject matter with the location and chose to write about the martyrdom of Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury from 1162 until his brutal murder within his own Cathedral church on 29 December 1170.
 
The story is well-known - the conflict between Thomas Becket and his royal master Henry II, which was sparked by the King’s secular interference in spiritual matters, culminating in a deadlock between these two strong personalities and the subsequent murder of Thomas by knights loyal to their king, who, legend has it, called out beseechingly in an angry moment, ‘Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?’
 
Well these were the events which provide the basis of Murder in the Cathedral, but the events are not told in chronicle format; Eliot structures the story in the manner of a Shakespeare play in which the events matter less than the situations. It examines the conflict between the material and the spiritual worlds, and Becket’s journey from spiritual doubt to certainty as he prepares for martyrdom, as well as the effect his actions have on the people of Canterbury. Interestingly, Eliot had been on his own spiritual journey in the 1930s. There had been a gradual burgeoning of his Christian awareness throughout his poems in this period as his agnosticism faded and his attraction to Catholicism developed. Eliot’s growing conversion to the Anglo-Catholic faith contributed greatly to the style of Murder in the Cathedral. It is a ritualistic poetic drama, giving the writer an opportunity to consider the inner thoughts and doubts of the central character, Thomas Becket. These thoughts centre on the nature of martyrdom; it is not seen as an act of personal glorification, but the acceptance of man’s will being subdued to the will of God—the path shown to man by Christ himself. For the poetic style of his play, Eliot went back to the roots of the drama, Greek tragedy, which was an act of religion, ritual, purgation and renewal. Later, the medieval morality play sought to achieve the same response from its audience by imaginative example, the anonymously written Everyman being the masterpiece of this genre. Murder in the Cathedral’s verse structure is based on the rhythms of Everyman, as is the ritual element and the symbolism of the characters.
 
From Greek tragedy, Eliot borrows the Chorus, which comments on and responds to the developing drama. The Chorus of the women of Canterbury is not however entirely symbolic; it is rooted in humanity and acts as a mirror for the audience to see and hear its own responses expressed. The tempting of Becket in the first part of the play reflects Everyman’s struggle to overcome his earthly strengths (Knowledge, Strength, Discretion etc) and let his Christian spirit alone prevail over all-conquering death. Eliot was keen to re-invent verse drama, which had largely become moribund in its imitation of Shakespeare, developing its ancient forms to suit a modern play. For instance, he uses the power of modern prose to shock when the knights try to justify their actions. Murder in the Cathedral is constructed with medieval simplicity: Part I – Shows Becket’s spiritual struggle. Interlude – His doubts resolved, Becket affirms his beliefs in a sermon preached on Christmas Day. Part II – Becket’s murder, and its meaning and effect on the people. The Te Deum at the end unites the past with the present in the ever-continuing, unchanging liturgy of the Church. It is an act of ritual worship and prayer, celebrating one man’s journey from doubt, through a struggle with pride, to renouncing self-will and embracing spiritual purity. The play can also be read on another level, as an examination of individual conscience at variance with the State.